¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2013/171

UNDT/2013/171, Applicant

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

In accordance with staff rule 4.3, when a staff member has been legally accorded nationality status by more than one state, the staff member’s nationality for purposes of the Staff Regulations and the Staff Rules shall be the nationality of the State to which the staff member is, in the opinion of the Secretary-General, most closely associated.In light of the provisions of staff rule 4.3, and in absence of any evidence that the discretion granted the Secretary-General by that rule has been exercised arbitrarily, in an abusive manner or vitiated by improper motives, the Tribunal finds that the Administration was correct in determining the Applicant’s nationality as German. This is especially so since the Applicant has not adduced any evidence that he is in fact more closely associated with Tunisia rather than Germany according to the requirement of the Staff Rule. The Tribunal therefore finds and holds that the Secretary-General’s discretion was properly exercised in deciding to determine the Applicant’s nationality as German for UN purposes.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant filed his Application on 22 July 2012 contesting a decision taken by the Human Resources Management Service (HRMS), United Nations Office in Geneva (UNOG) to determine his nationality as German instead of Tunisian for United Nations purposes.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Applicant
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Applicable Law