¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2013/165

UNDT/2013/165, Igogo

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal found that the ICTR management was right to comply with the checking out procedures by withholding the Applicant’s checkout since had been part of a committee that had not rendered financial accounts. The Applicant had been a member of an executive committee that had left office without accounting for finances during their tenure which prompted the ICTR management to withhold some of the Applicants entitlements until such accountability is undertaken. Accountability: The Applicant cannot reap a harvest of compensation from his own lack of accountability. He did not deny that he was an executive committee member and a bank signatory in the previous Staff Association’s executive committee which failed to provide a financial report and to conduct a proper handing-over to the succeeding committee.As an elected official the Applicant was responsible and accountable for the management of the affairs and finances of the ICTR Staff Union which elected him to serve. Discharging this responsibility within the Staff Association meant that all elected officers who form part of its executive were accountable, including the Applicant.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant filed his Application on 3 August 2012 challenging the decision of the ICTR management to withhold his final entitlements upon his separation from the Organization on 30 September 2011.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Igogo
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Applicable Law