UNDT/2013/145

UNDT/2013/145, Abassa

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

A judgment on receivability is not an executable judgment. It is not a judgment on the merits of the case where all issues have been adjudicated upon. An executable judgment is one in which the court determines on the substantive issues of the case having heard and deliberated on the evidence and arguments submitted by the parties. In so doing, it ends the dispute before the court which heard it. A judgment on receivability is based on a procedural issue. In the present case, the procedural issue had to do with the timeliness of the application and scope of the court’s jurisdiction where the statutory timelines have not been observed. In other words, the court never got to consider the merits because it was procedurally estopped from considering the substantive issues raised. It was therefore not an executable judgment within the meaning article 12.1 of the Statute.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

On 30 June 2012, the Applicant filed the current Application for Revision of Judgment No. UNDT/2012/086 with the United Nations Dispute Tribunal (UNDT). The Applicant seeks a Revision of the Judgment pursuant to article 12 of the UNDT Statute and article 29 of the UNDT Rules of Procedure, on the grounds that he did not receive the Dispute Tribunal’s email correspondence seeking his comments on the Respondent’s Reply on Receivability.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Abassa

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :