UNDT/2013/043, Oummih
The Tribunal found that the Applicant had not suffered any material or moral prejudice. With regard to OSLA’s refusal to provide her with legal assistance, the Tribunal found that the decision is not illegal since there was a conflict of interest . The Applicant is a staff member of OSLA and her application before the Tribunal concerns a written reprimand issued by her immediate supervisor, the Chief of OSLA.
The Applicant, who is currently a staff member of the Office of Staff Legal Assistance (“OSLA”), challenged the decision to issue and to place a written reprimand in her Official Status File (“OSF”) as well as the refusal by OSLA to provide her with legal assistance. The reprimand was later retracted and removed from the Applicant’s OSF after approximately one month.
Reprimand: Material and/or moral prejudice for a reprimand that was later retracted can only be claimed, if it was illegal and had a damaging effect during the period it was placed in a staff member’s OSF. Right to be provided with/obligation to provide legal assistance: OSLA possesses a large margin of discretion to decide whether it undertakes to represent a given client. A refusal to provide legal assistance has however to be sufficiently substantiated. Even if the motive of the decision to refuse legal assistance is flawed, the decision itself may be lawful, if another legal reason would have led to the same decision.