AV

UNDT/2013/043

UNDT/2013/043, Oummih

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal found that the Applicant had not suffered any material or moral prejudice. With regard to OSLA’s refusal to provide her with legal assistance, the Tribunal found that the decision is not illegal since there was a conflict of interest . The Applicant is a staff member of OSLA and her application before the Tribunal concerns a written reprimand issued by her immediate supervisor, the Chief of OSLA.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant, who is currently a staff member of the Office of Staff Legal Assistance (“OSLA”), challenged the decision to issue and to place a written reprimand in her Official Status File (“OSF”) as well as the refusal by OSLA to provide her with legal assistance. The reprimand was later retracted and removed from the Applicant’s OSF after approximately one month.

Legal Principle(s)

Reprimand: Material and/or moral prejudice for a reprimand that was later retracted can only be claimed, if it was illegal and had a damaging effect during the period it was placed in a staff member’s OSF. Right to be provided with/obligation to provide legal assistance: OSLA possesses a large margin of discretion to decide whether it undertakes to represent a given client. A refusal to provide legal assistance has however to be sufficiently substantiated. Even if the motive of the decision to refuse legal assistance is flawed, the decision itself may be lawful, if another legal reason would have led to the same decision.

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Oummih
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type