AV

UNDT/2012/155

UNDT/2012/155, Miseleni

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Receivability ratione materiae of application for suspension of action pending management evaluation: In order for the Tribunal to act upon an application for suspension of action submitted pursuant to article 2.2 of its Statute, an “administrative decision” must be at issue. According to the Tribunal’s case law, a challengeable administrative decision is a decision taken by the Administration which carries direct legal consequences in respect of the applicant’s rights under the terms of his or her appointment or contract of employment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

By letter dated 31 August 2012, the Applicant was informed that he met the criteria set out in a UNHCR internal memorandum setting special measures for reduction in workforce, and that his indefinite appointment could therefore be subject to termination in the event he was not selected for any vacant post in the course or before the September 2012 selection exercise. He challenged this “decision” before the Tribunal. The Tribunal considered that, since the Applicant’s termination for reduction of staff was only hypothetical, the content of the letter of 31 August 2012 could not be considered to directly affect his rights. It accordingly rejected the application as irreceivable, as well as the Respondent’s request for costs against the Applicant.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Miseleni
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type