AV

UNDT/2012/145

UNDT/2012/145, Suri

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Whether the decision being contested is the one taken by OHRM to separate the Applicant from service, or the earlier decision taken by UNSPC, or the pending decision of the ABCC, there is currently no case that is pending management evaluation. There is also no substantive application before the Tribunal in relation to which this request for interim relief could be considered. In any event, art. 10.2 of the Dispute Tribunal’s Statute provides that a suspension of the implementation of the contested administrative decision may not be granted in cases of termination, which includes separation for reasons of health and incapacity for further service (see staff rule 9.6(c)(iii)). In this regard the application stands to be dismissed.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The termination of her permanent appointment due to health reasons as a result of the 25 April 2012 approval by the United Nations Staff Pension Committee (“UNSPC”) of her disability benefits.

Legal Principle(s)

Article 2.2 of the Dispute Tribunal’s Statute provides an applicant with a measure of urgent interim relief in the form of a suspension of the implementation of a contested administrative decision, pending the review of the matter via management evaluation. Art. 10.2 of the Dispute Tribunal’s Statute empowers the Tribunal to provide an interim measure, to provide temporary relief to either party, in relation to a case which is already before the Tribunal. Such relief may include an order to suspend the implementation of a contested decision “except in cases of appointment, promotion or termination” (emphasis added).

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Suri
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type