¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2012/102

UNDT/2012/102, Servas

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Tribunal’s review of eligibility for benefits: The Secretary-General has no discretion to grant or deny a benefit provided for in the Staff Regulations and Rules and is bound, in this respect, by the applicable rules. Accordingly, when the matter before the Tribunal concerns the refusal to grant a benefit, the Tribunal may only examine whether the staff member was eligible for, or entitled to, such benefit, without taking into account the grounds for refusal provided by the Administration. The fact that other staff members in the same situation may have been granted the disputed benefit is irrelevant. Entitlement to repatriation grant: It is clear from annex IV to the Staff Regulations that an eligible staff member must relocate upon separation in order to be entitled to a repatriation grant. Entitlement to payment of travel expenses to place of home leave: In accordance with staff rules 7.1(b) and 5.2(c), the qualifying two years of continuous service for the payment of travel expenses to the place of home leave upon separation begin to accrue from the effective date the staff member became eligible for home leave.Outcome: Application rejected on the merits

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contests the decision denying her the payment of a repatriation grant and of her travel expenses (to her place of home leave) on separation from service. The Tribunal finds that she was not eligible for either benefit. As regards the repatriation grant, she did not relocate upon separation. Concerning the payment of travel expenses to her place of home leave, she had not completed two years of continuous service from the effective date of her becoming eligible for home leave.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Servas
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type