UNDT/2012/078 | SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

UNDT/2012/078, Perez-Soto

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Respondent was required to act in the best interests of the Organization, when reassigning the Applicant, and it was principally for the Respondent as the Chief Administrative Officer of the Organization, pursuant to art. 97 of the United Nations Charter, to define what those interests were in the context of the administration of the Organization Outcome: For respondent (merits).

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Reassignment.

Legal Principle(s)

Bad faith. It is for the Applicant who raises such allegations of ulterior motives to prove them. Consultations. As a matter of good staff relations and courtesy, it would be usual for a manager to discuss the possibility of reassignment with a staff member before making the final decision; however, there is no requirement in the relevant legal instruments for the Respondent to consult a staff member about a proposed reassignment. Delegation of authority. The decision to transfer the Applicant was taken by the appropriate person, namely the USG for Management. Decision not taken in the best interests of the Organization. Under former regulation 1.2(c), the Respondent had a broad discretion to assign any staff member to any of the activities or offices of the United Nations. Such discretion was not unfettered.

Outcome

Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

Perez-Soto

Entity

UN Secretariat

Case Number(s)

UNDT/NY/2010/061

Tribunal

UNDT

Registry Location :

New York