¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2012/030

UNDT/2012/030, Mirkovic

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Effect of reversal of decision on compensation: Because the contested decision was reversed by the Administration does not necessarily mean that the applicant is not entitled to claim compensation for the damage s/he may have suffered as a result of the unlawful decision. In a case where the Administration reversed the contested decision at the management evaluation stage, if an applicant can prove that s/he still sustains or sustained an injury resulting from the unlawful decision despite the rescission of the same, s/he has grounds for claiming compensation.Outcome:

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant was denied the right to appeal to the Central Examinations Board the decision that she was ineligible to take the 2010 ICTY G to P exam. In the management evaluation, the Secretary-General concluded that the decision to deny her the right of appeal was unlawful and reversed it, but rejected her claim for compensation. However, even though the Applicant was allowed eventually to exercise her right of appeal, it was too late for her to take the exam. Before the Tribunal, the Applicant requested three months’ net base salary in compensation for the damage suffered. The Tribunal found inter alia that any reasonable person in the Applicant’s situation of preparing for a competitive exam, especially one that could have such a significant impact on her career, would have suffered stress and emotional distress and that reversal of the unlawful decision after the exam had already taken place was not sufficient to repair the damage suffered by the Applicant. The Tribunal concluded that in the circumstances of the case, the Applicant was entitled to be compensated for the violation of her due process rights and the moral injury resulting thereof and awarded her EUR 2,000.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part
Outcome Extra Text

Judgment in favour of applicant in full (only financial compensation).The Applicant was awarded EUR 2,000 for moral damage.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Mirkovic
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type