UNDT/2012/021, Charles
UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements
The Tribunal notes that the Applicant has not submitted any evidence to support his claim that the Respondent was biased towards him and nothing in the case record suggests otherwise. His contention therefore fails.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant’s non-selection for a post.
Legal Principle(s)
The role of the Tribunal is limited to determine whether an applicant received full and fair consideration of her/his candidature and not to enter into a substantive analysis of her/his application. ; When a staff member alleges discrimination, he or she bears the burden of proving on a preponderance of evidence that discrimination occurred.
Outcome
Dismissed on merits
Applicants/Appellants
Charles
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Applicable Law