UNDT/2012/014

UNDT/2012/014, Albert

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal found that the contested requirement was not inconsistent with the intent of the General Assembly in its resolutions 37/126 and 51/226 and that it fell within the High Commissioner’s discretion to introduce this requirement in view of UNHCR operational realities. Whereas exceptions were made to the contested requirement for medical reasons based on the provisions of the Procedural guidelines for appointments, postings and promotions, the Applicants were not in the same situation as the staff members who were granted such exceptions and therefore they cannot claim that UNHCR did not comply with the obligation of equal treatment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicants contest the decision whereby the High Commissioner for Refugees considered that they were not eligible for consideration for conversion of their fixed-term appointments into indefinite appointments because they did not meet the requirement of two years of service in a category D/E duty station. They claim that the High Commissioner acted ultra vires in adding the additional requirement of two years of service in a category D/E duty station and that this requirement precludes reasonable consideration for conversion.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Albert

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :