AV

UNDT/2011/203

UNDT/2011/203, Allen

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal found that it is incumbent on the Organization to pay home leave travel expenses only for children who are declared and recognized as dependants of the staff member with whom they travel. Family members eligible for home leave travel: Staff rule 5.2(j), which provides that “[d]ependent children whose parents are staff members, each of whom is entitled to home leave, may accompany either parent”, must be interpreted in conjunction with staff rules 7.1 and 7.2. In doing so, it becomes clear that the Organization covers only the home leave travel expenses regarding children recognized as dependants of the staff member whom they accompany. For a child to have the possibility to accompany one parent or the other, he or she must be recognized as dependant of both staff members. Previous analogous errors: The fact that the Administration has mistakenly taken a different decision on previous occasions does not create any right for the staff member, given that the Administration must put an end to such errors. Discrimination: The interpretation made of the relevant staff rules does not entail any discrimination of children of non-married staff members. Indeed, all dependent children are treated in the same manner, that is, they may travel on home leave at the Organization’s expenses with a parent who recognized them as their dependants.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Both the Applicant and his partner are United Nations staff members in the Professional category. They have a child who was claimed as a dependant by his partner only, and recognized as such by the Organization. In 2010, the Applicant requested payment of his child’s travel expenses under his home leave entitlement. This request was denied on the grounds that his child was not considered as his dependant.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Allen
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type