UNDT/2010/150, Dzintars
UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements
The applicant was not separated because of the expiry of his fixed term contract, but because of the applicant’s shortcomings and of the fact that his performances did not meet expectations; the applicant was rated for two consecutive years “partially meets expectations”. The Tribunal finds that the applicant has been afforded his due process rights and that his rights were not violated. In the present case, the decision not to renew the applicant’s fixed-term appointment is not unlawful.
Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed
The applicant filed an appeal against the non-renewal of his fixed-term appointment.
Legal Principle(s)
N/A
Outcome
Dismissed on merits
Applicants/ Appellants
Dzintars
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Issuance Type
Document Topic/Theme :