2021-UNAT-1124, Commissioner-General of UNRWA
UNAT found that the UNRWA DT did not err in concluding that the Agency had failed to observe its own regulatory framework and failed to act lawfully, reasonably and fairly in exercising its discretion. The discretion of the Commissioner-General to reject a request for these benefits such as EVS is not unfettered.
UNRWA/DT/2020/037, in which UNRWA DT rescinded the decision to deny Mr. Othman’s request for exceptional voluntary separation (EVS) and awarded him an amount equivalent to his standard retirement benefits less any separation benefits already paid following his resignation.
The Commissioner-General established the criteria and priorities in writing in ACS A/6/2018 which is part of the regulatory framework. That framework (including ASC A/6/2018) does not state that not being on SLWOP or the essential nature of the post or the abolishment of the post are criteria for receiving EVS or to be used as factors in prioritizing EVS applications.
Appeal dismissed; UNRWA DT Judgment affirmed.