¹ú²úAV

2021-UNAT-1116, Ashraf Ismail Abed allah Zaqqout

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The impugned UNRWA DT Order clearly comes within its competence to issue appropriate case management orders. It did not exceed its competence or jurisdiction in issuing Order No. 123, and Mr. Zaqqout is not prevented from attacking the interlocutory order later if he appeals the final judgment of the UNRWA DT on the merits.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Order No. 123 (UNRWA/DT/2020), in which UNRWA DT ruled on several procedural motions filed by Mr. Zaqqout.

Legal Principle(s)

Interlocutory appeals in matters of evidence, procedure and trial conduct are not receivable, even when the first instance tribunal makes an error of law, if the issue can be raised later in an appeal against the final judgment on the merits. Interlocutory appeals may be receivable in exceptional cases where the first instance tribunal has clearly exceeded its jurisdiction or competence.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on receivability
Outcome Extra Text

The interlocutory appeal is not receivable.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Ashraf Ismail Abed allah Zaqqout
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type