¹ú²úAV

2020-UNAT-979, Igunda

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT considered an appeal of Order No. 079. UNAT held that, regardless of whether UNDT may have committed an error of law, fact, or procedure, Article 2(2) of the UNDT Statute precluded an appeal to UNAT if UNDT acted within its jurisdiction or competence. UNAT held that UNDT acted within its jurisdiction or competence. UNAT held that the appeal was not receivable. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNDT Order.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision not to renew his fixed-term appointment beyond its expiration as a result of a retrenchment exercise and submitted an application for suspension of action. In Order No. 079 (NBI/2019), the UNDT declined to suspend the administrative decision on grounds that the impugned administrative decision was not prima facie unlawful.

Legal Principle(s)

Appeals of UNDT decisions on suspensions of action are only receivable before UNAT if UNDT, in the adjudication of such applications, clearly exceeded its jurisdiction or competence.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Igunda
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type