¹ú²úAV

2020-UNAT-1059

2020-UNAT-1059, Bezziccheri

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT considered an application for revision of judgment No. 2019-UNAT-948 by Ms Bezziccheri. UNAT considered Ms Bezziccheri’s claim that ST/AI/2019/1 was unknown to her and UNAT at the time the judgment was issued. Noting the three elements that an applicant for revision must establish cumulatively before a final judgment of UNAT can be revised, UNAT held that the fact that ST/AI/2019/1 was known to UNAT when it issued its judgment (as it had been referred to therein) was sufficient in and of itself to fail the cumulative test. Further, UNAT noted that ST/AI/2019/1 was not determinative of Ms Bezziccheri’s case, but that it was referred to by UNAT as a non-binding suggestion to help the parties. UNAT dismissed the application for revision.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

In judgment No. 2019-UNAT-948, UNAT dismissed the Appellant’s appeal and affirmed the decision of UNDT in which it had declined to recommend her for consideration for a disability benefit by the United Nations Staff Pension Committee (UNSPC).

Legal Principle(s)

The three elements that an applicant for revision must establish cumulatively before a final judgment of UNAT can be revised are: (1) the previously absent fact must be decisive of the case; (2) that fact must have been unknown to UNAT and the Applicant at the time the UNAT judgment was rendered; and (3) such ignorance of the fact cannot have been attributable to negligence, presumably of the applicant.

Outcome
Revision, correction, interpretation or execution

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Bezziccheri
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type