2019-UNAT-897

2019-UNAT-897, Harris

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT held that the Appellant failed to demonstrate any error in the finding by UNDT that he had failed to meet his burden of proving that the assignment to work in Sector East was motivated by improper consideration. UNAT held that UNDT properly considered the relevant facts and the applicable law in concluding that the Administration had followed the prescribed procedures and acted in accordance with the internal law of the Organisation in separating him for abandonment of post. UNAT held that the Appellant could not choose to ignore a lawful direction by the Administration to provide medical evidence or return to work simply by requesting special leave. UNAT held that there was no basis for awarding compensation. UNAT held that the three medical certificates the Appellant had attached to his appeal were inadmissible. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNDT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested his separation from service for abandonment of post. UNDT held that the decision to separate the Applicant for abandonment of post was lawful.

Legal Principle(s)

Traditionally, the reassignment of staff members’ functions comes within the broad discretion of the Organisation to use its resources and personnel as it deems appropriate.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Harris

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry :