¹ú²úAV

UNAT held that the nature of the contested decision before UNDT was not entirely clear. On the UNDT’s finding that the Appellant had not adduced any evidence in support of his claim that the Settlement Agreement was imposed upon him by duress and threats, and therefore must fail, UNAT found no error of law or fact in the decision and affirmed the UNDT judgment on this point. UNAT held that UNDT failed to deal with the Appellant’s claim of harassment and discrimination. UNAT held that the Appellant’s right to due process entitlement him to a fair hearing and a fully reasoned judgment of his application. UNAT held that the UNDT’s omission to adjudge the whole of the Appellant’s application was a violation of his due process rights and constituted a procedural error such as to affect the decision of the case. UNAT allowed the appeal in part and remanded the case to UNDT to complete the hearing of the application.