2014-UNAT-491, Roig
UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements
UNAT considered Ms Roig’s application for correction and noted that there were no clerical or arithmetical mistakes in the judgment. UNAT noted that the correction procedure is not an opportunity for a party to reargue their case or to merely repeat arguments that did not previously succeed. UNAT dismissed the application for correction.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
Former UNAT judgment: Ms Roig challenged the selection of another candidate for a position. UNDT rejected her application as time-barred and not receivable. UNAT affirmed UNDT’s decision and dismissed Ms Roig’s appeal.
Legal Principle(s)
The correction procedure is not an opportunity for a party to reargue their case or to merely repeat arguments that did not previously succeed.
Outcome
Revision, correction, interpretation or execution
Applicants/Appellants
Roig
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Document Topic/Theme :
Applicable Law