¹ú²úAV

2014-UNAT-472, Nianda-Lusakueno

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT recalled that it has consistently held that Article 8(3) of the UNDT Statute must be read literally to prohibit UNDT from waiving the deadlines for seeking management evaluation and that UNDT has no jurisdiction or competence to waive such deadlines. UNAT held that ignorance of the law is no excuse and, while it was unfortUNATe that Mr. Nianda-Lusakueno relied on the informal review procedure, such reliance did not qualify as exceptional circumstances under ICAO Staff Rule 111. 1, paragraph 8. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the decision of the Secretary-General of ICAO.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Mr Nianda-Lusakueno contested the decision not to extend his contract. The Advisory Joint Appeals Board (AJAB) rejected Mr Nianda-Lusakueno’s appeal as time-barred. The Secretary-General of ICAO accepted the AJAB’s recommendation and denied Mr Nianda-Lusakueno’s request for a waiver of the time limit for the filing of his appeal.

Legal Principle(s)

Article 8(3) of the UNDT Statute must be read literally to prohibit UNDT from waiving the deadlines for seeking management evaluation. Ignorance of the law is no excuse for missing deadlines.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on merits
Outcome Extra Text

No relief ordered; No relief ordered

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/ Appellants
Nianda-Lusakueno
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry Location :
Date of Judgment
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type