¹ú²úAV

2013-UNAT-375

2013-UNAT-375, Schoone

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT considered appeals from both Mr Schoone and the Secretary-General. UNAT held that, for the reasons set forth in judgment Nos. 2013-UNAT-357 (Malmstrom et al. ), 2013-UNAT-358 (Longone) and 2013-UNAT-359 (Ademagic et al. ), the delegation of authority granted to the ICTY Registrar could not be construed so as to grant him the authority to convert staff members’ fixed-term appointments into permanent appointments. UNAT recalled that in those three cases it had held that the decision-making authority to grant permanent appointments was properly vested in the Assistant Secretary-General for Human Resources, but that she failed to exercise her discretion in a lawful manner, by adopting a blanket policy of denial of permanent appointments to ICTY staff members rather than affording them the individual, full and fair consideration of their suitability for conversion to permanent appointment to which they were entitled and, as such, UNAT had concluded that the staff members were discriminated against and the impugned decisions were legally void, being tainted by arbitrariness and the violation of the staff member’s due process rights. UNAT held that the reasoning of those three cases applied, mutatis mutandis, to Mr Schoone’s case. UNAT held that Mr Schoone’s situation differed with respect to remedy because his resignation to take up function in another duty station effectively ended his right to consideration for permanent appointment. UNAT held that Mr Schoone was not entitled to compensation for non-pecuniary damages as he did not so request and he could not claim to have so suffered, given his voluntary departure from ICTY. UNAT held that Mr Schoone’s claims regarding his resignation and break in service were not properly before UNAT, having not been the subject of a timely request for management evaluation. UNAT upheld the Secretary-General’s appeal, rejected Mr Schoone’s appeal and vacated the UNDT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

UNDT judgment: The Applicant contested the decision not to grant him a permanent appointment. UNDT found for the Applicant, rescinding the decision not to grant him a permanent appointment and set compensation as an alternative to specific performance of 2,000 Euros.

Legal Principle(s)

The delegation of authority granted to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) Registrar cannot be construed so as to grant him the authority to convert fixed-term appointments into permanent appointments.

Outcome
Appeal dismissed on merits; Appeal granted

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Schoone
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Document Topic/Theme :