¹ú²úAV

UNAT held that the complaints against the Appellant were very serious and intolerable for any employer. UNAT held that UNDT had correctly concluded that the case against the Appellant stood substantiated and corroborated and the evidence sufficiently supported the charge of improperly soliciting and receiving money from local people in exchange for their recruitment and service as UN staff. UNAT held that during the teleconference the Appellant had produced two impostors as witnesses, who testified that they had lied to the investigators and made false allegations against the Appellant. UNAT held that the credible and reliable evidence of the witnesses and the contemptuous conduct of the Appellant could only lead to the conclusion that the Appellant was guilty of the charge of soliciting and accepting bribes. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNDT judgment.