¹ú²úAV

2012-UNAT-221

2012-UNAT-221, Simmons

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT considered Ms Simmons’ appeal and the Secretary-General’s cross-appeal. With respect to Ms Simmons’ claim that UNDT erred when it determined that compensation of USD 500 was reasonable compensation for the procedural breaches, which occurred regarding her performance appraisal for 2007-2008, UNAT found that UNDT placed undue weight on Ms Simmons’ omissions and/or actions. UNAT held that the compensation awarded for this breach was manifestly insufficient. With respect to Ms Simmons’ claim that she did not receive full and fair consideration regarding Post 1, UNAT held that UNDT did not err in its assessment of the selection process and that Ms Simmons did not substantiate claims of bias or prejudice on part of the interview panel. With respect to the Secretary-General’s cross-appeal, UNAT noted that, by virtue of the absence of any specific argument as to whether the claim regarding the 2008-2009 performance appraisal was receivable ratione materiae, having been made prior to the UNDT Order No. 325 (NY/2010), the Secretary-General was now estopped from raising such issue on appeal before UNAT. With respect to Ms Simmons’ claim that an award of USD 3,000 was not reasonable compensation for the breach which occurred in relation to her 2008-2009 performance appraisal, UNAT found that UNDT did not take sufficient cognisance of the seriousness of the breach or the stress it caused. UNAT granted the appeal in part, rejected the cross-appeal and substituted UNDT’s total award of USD 3,500 with an award of compensation equivalent to three months’ net base salary in effect on 31 March 2008 and compensation equivalent to three months’ net base salary in effect on 31 March 2009.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Ms Simmons contested the decisions not to select her to fill either Post 1 or Post 2, and the failure to approve her work plan for her 2007-2008 performance appraisal. UNDT rejected her application regarding her non-selection for Post 1 and Post 2. However, UNDT found that the required procedures for completing Ms Simmons’ 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 performance appraisals were not followed, which warranted compensation. UNDT awarded her a total of USD 3,500 as compensation: USD 500 for the delay in completing the 2007-2008 performance appraisal and the resulting stress and USD 3,000 for the delay in completing the 2008-2009 performance appraisal and the resulting stress.

Legal Principle(s)

UNDT or a first-instance tribunal is in the best position to assess matters of a factual nature.

Outcome
Appeal granted in part

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Simmons
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type