2012-UNAT-193, Al Sayyed
UNAT considered Mr Al Sayyed’s appeal and found that the decision to terminate his service, effective from close of business 15 December 2007, and as communicated to him on 30 November 2007, was superseded by the action he took on 4 December 2007, an action reinforced by him on 7 January 2008. Under these circumstances, UNAT held that UNRWA did not err in dismissing Mr Al Sayyed’s appeal against his termination on the basis that there was no termination decision capable of review. UNAT dismissed the appeal.
UNRWA decision: Mr Al Sayyed contested the decision to terminate his service with UNRWA. The UNRWA Commissioner-General rejected this appeal and held that Mr Al Sayyed’s employment relationship with UNRWA ended as a result of his decision to opt for early retirement and not as a result of the termination.
When an Applicant’s appointment is terminated by their voluntary action, rather than as the result of any wrongful act of the Respondent, there is no basis for the Applicant’s claims and all relief sought is refused.
No relief ordered; No relief ordered.