2011-UNAT-135, Larkin
UNAT held that the services provided by OSLA and the way the representation is implemented can have an impact on a staff member’s terms of employment and can therefore fall within the jurisdiction of UNDT, without interfering with the professional independence of counsel. UNAT held that the decision taken by the former Chief of OSLA not to disclose a potential conflict of interest in the staff member’s case could have an impact on his terms of employment and, therefore, constituted an administrative decision subject to review by UNDT. UNAT reversed the UNDT judgment and remanded the case to UNDT for a trial on the merits.
The staff member contested the decision taken by the former Chief of OSLA not to disclose a potential conflict of interest in his case. UNDT rejected the staff member’s application, holding that the alleged omission was not an administrative decision subject to review by UNDT.
The services provided by OSLA and the way the representation is implemented can have an impact on a staff member’s terms of employment and therefore constitute an administrative decision subject to review by UNDT.