2011-UNAT-126, Lesar
UNAT considered an application for revision of Judgment No. 1465 of the former UN Administrative Tribunal submitted by Mr Lesar. UNAT noted that General Assembly resolution 63/253 was silent on the question of revision of judgments handed down by the former UN Administrative Tribunal during the period prior to its abolishment. UNAT held that the omission did not constitute a denial of the right to an effective remedy since a tribunal had already dispensed justice. UNAT held that it was not competent to revise the former UN Administrative Tribunal Judgment and that therefore, the application was not receivable. UNAT dismissed the application.
Mr Lesar contested the decision to inform the Austrian authorities that he was the subject of an investigation. In Judgment No. 1465 Applicant (2009), the former UN Administrative Tribunal rejected Mr Lesar’s appeal.
UNAT does not have the authority to revise judgments handed down by the former UN Administrative Tribunal. Only the court that handed down a decision has the power to revise it unless a rule of law determines to transfer it to another court.