2010-UNAT-009 | SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE

2010-UNAT-009, James

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

UNAT considered Mr James’ appeal and the Secretary-General’s cross-appeal. UNAT affirmed UNDT’s finding that Mr James was not eligible for the P-3 position both because he did not take the required examination and because of the lack of required qualifications. UNAT accordingly dismissed Mr James’ appeal that UNDT erred in not awarding him compensation for loss of opportunity. UNAT allowed the cross-appeal and set aside the order for compensation for distress. UNAT noted that the compensation was not requested, there was no evidence of damage or injuries, and Mr James acknowledged on appeal that he only claimed monetary loss as his real injury. UNAT noted that the applicable law governing compensation precludes such an award. UNAT dismissed Mr James’ appeal and affirmed UNDT’s finding that he was ineligible for the P-3 position. UNAT allowed the cross-appeal and set aside the order for compensation for distress.

Decision Contested or Judgment Appealed

Mr James contested his non-appointment to a P-3 position. UNDT found that he could not be recruited from his general service role to the professional level without undergoing the required examination. UNDT awarded a three-month salary as compensation for the distress caused by the Organisation.

Legal Principle(s)

An individual may not be awarded compensation for the loss of an opportunity if they were not eligible for the said opportunity.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full Judgment

Applicants/ Appellants

James

Entity

UNOPS

Case Number(s)

2009-010

Tribunal

UNAT

Registry Location :

New York