The Dispute Tribunal committed an error in procedure by relying on ex parte evidence in the form of three doctors鈥� notes, of which the Secretary-General received the translated copies only two days before the issuance of the impugned Judgment, in violation of audi alteram partem. The Dispute Tribunal failed to consider the 鈥渃hecks and balances to ensure transparency鈥� instituted in established procedures as outlined in the Guidelines and the ability of the Applicant to raise timely concerns about potential bias after the interview. As there is no obligation to provide the names of the...