UNAT held that exceptional circumstances existed which warranted an extension of time. UNAT held that UNDT鈥檚 discretion should have been exercised in the Appellant鈥檚 favour because it affected access to justice and there is a presumption that access to justice should not be denied at the outset without compelling reasons, which were absent. UNAT held that circumstances beyond the Appellant鈥檚 control prevented him from acting to file his appeal within the time limit and it would be unjust to visit upon the Appellant the consequences of an error (a fail in the electronic filing system) for which...