The UNAT refused the Appellant鈥檚 request for an oral hearing because it would not assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case鈥�, (Article 18(1) UNAT Rules). UNAT agreed with UNDT that there were 鈥渋nordinate delays both at reviewing and assessing the complaint and in setting [up] a fact-finding panel and conducting the investigation itself鈥� and that UNAMA was in breach of ST/SGB/2008/5. UNAT also agreed with the Secretary-General that the Appellant failed to demonstrate on appeal any error by the UNDT that would justify the reversal of its judgment. UNAT found that the Appellant鈥檚...