Discrimination and other improper motives
Bias/favouritism
Due process
Access to justice
Jurisdiction / receivability (UNAT)
Appeal
Legal services (OSLA or other) and self-representation
Legal representation
Staff selection (non-selection/non-promotion)
Full and fair consideration
Selection decision
Gender
The UNAT held that the ICAO Appeals Board implemented internal changes in its law to satisfy the requirements of Article 2(10) of the Appeals Tribunal Statute. It found that the Appeals Board no longer provided only advice or mere recommendations to the ICAO Secretary General, but rather final decisions and, therefore, was a neutral first instance process. It further found that while it might have been open to ICAO to consider using the UNDT for resolution of staff member disputes, it was free not to do so and cannot be criticised for doing as it did. It concluded that the Appeals Board’s...