¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2019/141

UNDT/2019/141, Negasa

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Since the Applicant has not sought management evaluation of the alleged instruction for him to work for Warrior Security Limited Company or his allegations of harassment and retaliation in relation to the performance improvement plan, those claims are not properly before the Tribunal. Consequently, the decision to appoint another staff member at the same level as the Applicant’s supervisor and FRO is the only decision that the Tribunal can entertain. Clearly, the Tribunal cannot reinstate an application that was withdrawn by the Applicant in 2015 and has no bearing whatsoever on the decision he is contesting in his application of 11 December 2018. Given that the Respondent has granted the Applicant the remedies he sought, the Tribunal concludes that the Applicant no longer has a live claim and that his application is now moot.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The decisions to designate a staff member, who is also at the same level (FS5 level), as the Applicant’s First Reporting Officer (FRO) and the instruction for him to work for Warrior Security Limited Company, a contractor providing security services to UNMISS.

Legal Principle(s)

The mootness doctrine.

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Negasa
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Applicable Law