¹ú²úAV

UNDT/2011/153

UNDT/2011/153, Chattopadhyay

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

It was not disputed by the Applicant that what he contested was not a decision which was actually made. Rather, he challenged a possible decision (to require him to take a break in service) which would most likely be made by the United Nations Office at Geneva. The Tribunal considered that no decision had been made at the time when the Applicant filed his application. Consequently, the application was found irreceivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant requested the Tribunal to suspend, during the pendency of the management evaluation, the implementation of the decision to require him to take a 31-day break in service after the expiration of his fixed-term appointment and prior to his reappointment on a temporary contract.

Legal Principle(s)

In accordance with article 2.2 of its Statute, the Tribunal may suspend, during the pendency of the management evaluation, the implementation of a contested administrative decision where the decision appears to be prima facie unlawful, the matter is of particular urgency and the Applicant would suffer irreparable damage if the decision in question is not suspended.

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Chattopadhyay
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry :
Date of Judgement
Judge(s)
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type
Applicable Law