The UNAT held that the facts upon which the staff member relied in his application for revision all post-dated the UNAT Judgment and therefore could not serve as a basis for revising or reconsidering the UNAT鈥檚 prior conclusions. In particular, the UNAT found that the staff member鈥檚 medical record, indicating a change in his condition after the issuance of the UNAT Judgment, did not constitute grounds for revising it.
However, the UNAT granted the staff member鈥檚 request for anonymity for the present Judgment only, given the limited scope of the issues raised and the specific facts...