As a preliminary matter, the UNAT held that the fact that the UNDT might have repeated some or most of the Respondent鈥檚 arguments and language in its judgment would not be sufficient to undermine the UNDT鈥檚 considerations or determinations.
Regarding the scope of the appeal, the UNAT held that since the remedy claimed in the appeal does not aim for the rescission of the reassignment, but the placement into a P-5 or D-1 post commensurate with the Appellant鈥檚 skills, training, qualifications, and experience for which she has applied and which was not the subject of her initial application, the...