¹ś²śAV

2021-1629

Showing 1 - 1 of 1

The UNAT held that it was satisfied that execution of the UNDT Judgment (as affirmed by the UNAT) had occurred in Mr. Ozturkā€™s case. The Administration had complied with the UNAT Judgment and exercised its discretion in determining a new, revised amount to be deducted for child support from Mr. Ozturk's salary on the basis of national court orders.

The UNAT observed that Mr. Ozturk appeared only to disagree with the ā€œrefund calculationā€ by the Administration for prior overpayments. However, the UNAT noted that implementation by the Administration of a Tribunalā€™s order constitutes in itself an...