UNAT considered an appeal by Ms. Banaj against Judgment No. UNDT/2021/030.
UNAT held that a reallocation of duties pending the outcome of an investigation as occurred in Ms. Banaj鈥檚 case is permissible as an interim measure in such circumstances, but not as the exercise of the general power of assignments available to the Secretary-General in Staff Regulation 1.2(c) [鈥 But, under Staff Rule 10.4 and the Framework relating to interim measures pending an investigation and disciplinary process, there is an alternative measure of reallocation of duties available in such cases where the...