UNAT held that there was nothing in the applicable law in force at the time of the events which formed a basis for the Administration鈥檚 practice of removing the candidates鈥� names from the language roster once they had been recruited or placed against a position. UNAT held that the removal of a candidate from the roster prevented the Administration from evaluating and reassigning or selecting a candidate for a similar post in another duty station. UNAT held that the Appellant鈥檚 removal from the roster adversely impacted his potential ability for mobility and for obtaining additional incentives...