Interlocutory or interim appeal / Appeal of UNDT order to UNAT
Manifest excess of jurisdiction
Jurisdiction / receivability (UNDT or first instance)
UNAT held that the Appellant did not meet her burden of proving that UNDT clearly exceeded its jurisdiction or competence when it reassigned the cases. UNAT held that the UNDT decision on assignment and reassignment of judges are matters of case management and the fair and efficient functioning of the tribunal鈥檚 processes and within the UNDT鈥檚 jurisdiction. UNAT held that there had been no removal or replacement of Judge Downing, but rather that his term had expired. UNAT held that UNDT did not clearly exceed its jurisdiction and the appeals were not receivable. UNAT also noted that it does...