国产AV

2019-1269

Showing 1 - 1 of 1

UNAT held that the Appellant did not provide evidence with sufficient particularity of any specific instances in which he had requested compensation for overtime, or the Administration had denied such a request. UNAT held that the UNDT鈥檚 finding that absent any identifiable administrative decision the application was not receivable ratione materiae was correct. UNAT held that the Appellant鈥檚 argument that his overtime work without compensation over the years was in violation of the Administration鈥檚 responsibility to establish a normal working week for its employees and was thus a continuous...