Disciplinary matters / misconduct
Facts (establishment of) / evidence
Staff selection (non-selection/non-promotion)
Full and fair consideration
Interview
Selection decision
UNAT considered the appeal. UNAT found no reason to differ from UNDT鈥檚 conclusion. UNAT found that the applicable procedural requirements were followed, and the evidence did not supersede the presumption of regularity of the administrative decision. UNAT further noted that the Appellant was afforded full and fair consideration and that he failed to establish any bias by the members of the panel. UNAT also held that the Appellant forewent the required procedures for filing complaints of discrimination and failed to provide evidence that he was the target of the restructuring exercise or that it...