UNAT held that there was no provision in the Staff Regulations or Rules stating that the Secretary-General鈥檚 discretionary authority to issue a written reprimand as a non-disciplinary measure pursuant to Staff Rule 10.2(b) (i) was predicated upon and limited to the existence of an ongoing employment contract. UNAT found that to hold otherwise would render baseless those standards of conduct that survive active service. In addition, UNAT held that, from a practical perspective, it would stymie the Secretary-General鈥檚 ability and discretionary authority to properly manage investigations and...