Investigation
Fact-finding investigation
Jurisdiction / receivability (UNDT or first instance)
Subject matter (ratione materiae)
Referral for accountability
UNAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. UNAT held that the decision to set up a fact-finding panel was not, in and of itself, a decision relating to the contractual rights of a staff member. UNAT held that such a decision was preliminary in nature and irregularities in connection with that decision, including alleged delay in reaching that decision, may only be challenged in the context of an appeal after the conclusion of the entire process. UNAT held that UNDT鈥檚 conclusion that the application was receivable was without legal basis as was its award of compensation. UNAT held that...