Discrimination and other improper motives
Jurisdiction / receivability (UNDT or first instance)
Subject matter (ratione materiae)
UNAT held that there was no reason to interfere with UNDT鈥檚 finding that the Appellant had not established the existence of a decision capable of giving UNDT jurisdiction to embark upon a consideration of his complaints. UNAT held that UNDT had correctly determined that the application was not receivable ratione materiae. UNAT held that UNDT should not have embarked on a consideration of substantive issues, such as staff consultations and discrimination arguments, but instead should have confined itself to the issue of receivability. UNAT dismissed the appeal with regard to the receivability...