UNAT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General limited to the discrete issue of the 鈥淥bservations鈥� of UNDT. UNAT held that the Secretary-General, despite being the beneficiary of a UNDT judgment in his favour, was entitled to appeal the observations. UNAT held that UNDT overstepped the mark to a significant degree in effectively recording, as part of its judgment, 鈥淥bservations鈥� in the manner in which it did. UNAT held that, in light of the UNDT鈥檚 determination on the issue of receivability, UNDT had no jurisdiction to make 鈥淥bservations鈥� as it did. UNAT allowed the appeal and ordered that...