UNAT held that UNDT did not err when it decided that the present appeal by a former staff member to have access to the UNOV premises was not among the listed grounds of jurisdiction of the UNDT and was therefore not receivable. UNDT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNDT judgment.
2010-157
Showing 1 - 2 of 2
Judgment-related matters
Revision of Judgment
Jurisdiction / receivability (UNAT)
Personal (ratione personae)
Jurisdiction / receivability (UNDT or first instance)
Personal (ratione personae)
UNAT considered an application for revision of judgment No. 2011-UNAT-154. UNAT held that the new evidence was irrelevant because the case was not receivable; neither UNDT nor UNAT had jurisdiction to hear Mr. Sims’ case. UNAT denied the application.